Study: Beyond Meatless: How Hybrid Proteins Could Redefine Asia’s Meat Future

Courtesy: Getty

A quiet but consequential shift is underway in Asia’s protein landscape, one that might determine how the world’s most populous region feeds itself sustainably. According to a joint report by The Good Food Institute Asia Pacific (GFI APAC) and NECTAR, Enhancing Meat with Plant Proteins: A Sensory Analysis in APAC, products that blend animal and plant proteins, known as balanced or blended proteins (BPs), are emerging as a powerful bridge between conventional meat and fully plant-based alternatives. The study, first of its kind in Asia to quantify sensory parity between meat and plant-enhanced proteins, was carried out with Singapore’s Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI) under A*STAR, and found that these hybrid products can meet consumer expectations on taste, while offering meaningful benefits in nutrition and sustainability. It’s an early but critical signal that the region’s food future may not be about going meatless, but about rethinking meat itself.

A New Balance for Asia’s Protein Future

Asia’s appetite for meat has grown rapidly with rising incomes and urbanization. Meat consumption across the region is projected to increase by 78% by 2050, a staggering surge that strains global supply chains, accelerates deforestation, and drives emissions. Conventional livestock farming remains deeply inefficient: producing one calorie of beef requires up to 100 calories of feed, while even chicken, the most efficient meat, returns just one calorie for every nine consumed. Such inefficiencies are no longer just environmental issues; they are economic and food security risks.

Balanced proteins offer a pragmatic response. By combining animal meat with high-quality plant proteins like soy, pea, or mushrooms, companies can drastically reduce environmental impact while maintaining the sensory satisfaction consumers associate with meat. Unlike many plant-based substitutes, BPs don’t aim to mimic meat; they are meat, simply enhanced for better nutrition and lower carbon footprints. “These enhanced meats allow us to deliver the taste and texture people expect, with less strain on the planet,” said Caroline Cotto, Director at NECTAR and co-author of the report. This positioning, less about replacement, more about redesign, is precisely what could make the category succeed where earlier alternatives struggled.

The report also highlights why Asia may be particularly fertile ground for this evolution. The region has a long culinary tradition of pairing plant and animal proteins, think Indonesia’s sambal tempeh with anchovies, Korea’s doenjang-jjigae, or China’s mapo tofu. This cultural familiarity makes hybrid foods feel less like a novelty and more like an extension of established cuisine. According to GFI’s consumer data, 93% of Southeast Asians expressed interest in trying blended meat, including a majority who are skeptical about purely plant-based options. For Asia, where food innovation often succeeds when it complements rather than challenges tradition, this alignment could be transformative.

Taste, Trust, and the Hybrid Advantage

Taste remains the ultimate arbiter in food innovation, and here, the findings were both surprising and encouraging. Out of 20 hybrid products tested across 10 categories, including beef patties, nuggets, and chicken mince, one BP chicken mince outperformed its 100% animal counterpart in blind tests, achieving taste superiority on key sensory attributes. On average, the best-performing BPs were only 0.2 to 0.5 points below animal meat on a seven-point liking scale, a negligible difference given the minimal R&D investment so far. Across all categories, consumers rated BPs 1.8 times more favorably than fully plant-based products, signaling that the hybrid approach may finally crack the taste barrier that has slowed the growth of alternative proteins.

Still, the report doesn’t shy away from the challenges ahead. Flavour, not texture, remains the main differentiator. Many participants noted “beany,” “off,” or “bland” notes, suggesting that companies must focus on improving aftertaste, savouriness, and umami. Appearance also played a role: colour and internal structure were often rated below those of conventional meat, a reminder that visual appeal remains crucial in consumer perception. Texture, however, showed the smallest gap, an encouraging sign that advances in plant protein processing are paying off.

Beyond sensory performance, consumer psychology emerged as a decisive factor. Around 69% of consumers perceived BPs as healthier than meat, but fewer associated them with better taste or affordability. The report argues that companies should focus on positioning BPs as “better meat,” rather than a new or niche product. Marketing that leans into familiarity - “same great taste, now with 20% more protein”- may outperform narratives around innovation or ethics. This approach could also help win over demographics already showing strong interest: women, younger adults, and consumers with higher levels of education. Notably, half of potential BP buyers expressed little or no interest in plant-based meat, indicating that hybrid products can reach entirely new audiences that current alternatives fail to engage.

Consumers’ willingness to try BPs was also striking. In Singapore’s controlled sensory panels, 91% of participants said they would replace at least some meat meals with BPs, and 28% said they would substitute at least half. Most preferred blends that remain meat-forward, around 75% animal to 25% plant, indicating that the best entry strategy for companies is incremental: start with small changes that don’t compromise taste, then gradually shift toward more plant-forward formulations as consumer comfort grows.

From R&D to Market Reality: What’s Needed Next

If the promise of blended proteins is clear, realizing it at scale will require coordination, investment, and a mindset shift across the food system. The report calls for greater R&D funding focused on flavour optimization, appearance consistency, and regional adaptation. While many products tested were still in early-stage development, the sensory data demonstrate that parity, or even superiority, with animal meat is within reach. Building on this foundation means investing in ingredient functionality, not just formulation. That includes refining protein extraction methods to reduce beany off-notes, improving fat distribution for juiciness, and integrating savoury vegetable or mushroom-based components that enhance mouthfeel naturally.

Localization will be key. As the report notes, most Asian families rely on a handful of familiar dishes, five to seven on rotation, and these vary by culture and geography. Designing BPs that integrate seamlessly into these dishes will determine whether consumers adopt them long term. The next wave of innovation, therefore, should look beyond Western burger formats to regional staples: Thai phat kaphrao, Vietnamese bún chả, Filipino adobo, and beyond. This cultural tailoring could make blended proteins not just acceptable, but desirable.

Courtesy: Pat LaFrieda's 50Cut

Equally critical is industry collaboration. Startups, meat producers, and research institutes each hold pieces of the puzzle. For legacy meat companies, BPs offer a credible pathway to decarbonize without sacrificing market share. For plant-based startups, the category represents a strategic pivot, away from head-to-head competition with meat and toward ingredient partnerships that can accelerate adoption and stabilize revenue. As Prof. Jianshe Chen of SIFBI put it, “Enhancing animal meat with high-quality plant proteins can boost taste and broaden its appeal among local consumers. The fact that one of these enhanced meats already outperforms its conventional counterpart shows how strong the foundation is.”

Governments and investors also have a role to play. Policymakers can create incentives for hybrid innovation through sustainability-linked financing, R&D grants, or inclusion of BPs in public procurement programs for schools and hospitals. Meanwhile, impact investors and corporate venture arms can help fill the funding gap for sensory research and scale-up facilities. Initiatives like those by Compass Group, which has already substituted 30% of its beef mince with blended versions to meet decarbonization goals, demonstrate the model’s commercial viability. If global chains such as Burger King or McDonald’s adopted 50/50 blended patties, GFI estimates the resulting emissions savings could exceed 51 million tonnes of CO₂, roughly equal to the annual emissions of Switzerland.

Ultimately, blended proteins are more than an incremental product; they are a systems innovation that redefines what progress in food looks like. They don’t reject meat, nor do they idealize its alternatives; they reimagine how both can coexist in a world of rising demand and finite resources. For Asia, where growth and tradition constantly intersect, that may be the most sustainable balance of all.